Stuck in the past : On the Heritage Council of Victoria’s State of Local Heritage Report / by Lesh and Myers

Shed 26 Port Adelaide David Mariuz AAP
Above: Despite public protests and the SA Heritage Council supporting its listing, Shed 26, Port Adelaide, was demolished in 2019.
(Source: David Mariuz  / AAP)

Knowledge of local heritage protection measures and support for these are often lacking, according to a recent Heritage Council of Victoria report. The report suggests this points to a need for public education.

The report, State of Heritage Review: Local Heritage 2020, includes Australia-wide comparisons. It is part of an ongoing assessment of conservation approaches by the Heritage Council, an independent statutory body.

Lesh notes:

Local heritage is the mechanism for conserving the vast majority of places of significance across Australia. In Victoria, local heritage overlays protect 186,000 properties. In New South Wales, local environment plans cover 40,000 primary sites and thousands more of lesser importance.

Significantly, the report identifies that knowledge and support for heritage measures are often lacking in the community, but does not speculate why. The report does not consider (and it’s beyond its terms of reference) engagement with the potential of heritage – what it could be for people.

In 1972, under the Liberal Hamer government, in line with international trends, Victoria became the first Australian state to introduce historic buildings legislation. Two years later, the federal Labor Whitlam government proposed the objective of heritage was to safeguard “the things that you keep”

The reliance on these ostensibly objective and seemingly stable instruments creates distinctive challenges. Integrated with the planning system, local heritage too often seems to conflict with evolving questions of development, land use, ownership, sustainability, participation and design.

Local heritage can promote community empowerment, social and racial justice, and sustainability. People-centred conservation is a way to place the community at the heart of heritage.

Read the original article in The Conversation, republished in Architecture AU and Architecture and Design.

See more of Dr Lesh’s work here.

Authors

James Lesh Research Fellow, Melbourne School of Design, The University of Melbourne

Kali Myers Research Associate, The University of Melbourne

error: Content is Protected